Hyundai Trajet MOT Results

Registered in 2005
46.8% pass rate
from 760 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Trajet is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual lamps (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.39% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
  • 25% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Component mounting (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (32 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 4.6% fail on Macpherson strut (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.66% fail on Front
    • 0.39% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Location
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.13% fail on Bellows
    • 0.13% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Axles
      • 0.13% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 20% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Components (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake back plates
    • 3.4% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Condition (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.39% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.53% fail on Spare wheel (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Free play
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.92% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Rams
    • 0.39% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering column
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
    • 0.53% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages