MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Trajet » 2003

Hyundai Trajet MOT Results

Registered in 2003
44.2% pass rate
from 480 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Trajet is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (58% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Macpherson strut (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.0% fail on Front
      • 0.21% fail on Rear
    • 0.83% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.83% fail on Condition (30 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.1% fail on Headlamps (67% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Headlamp (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.42% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Horn
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.7% fail on Components
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses
      • 0.42% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.6% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on ABS
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pipes and hoses (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
    • 0.21% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.21% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Seats
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.21% fail on Towbars
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages