MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Trajet » 2002

Hyundai Trajet MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.5% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Trajet is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.3% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 9.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.3% fail on Battery(ies) (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
  • 15% fail on Tyres (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.2% fail on Transmission
      • 8.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 8.2% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Panel
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 9.8% fail on Wipers
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 4.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages