Hyundai Trajet MOT Results

Registered in 2002
42.7% pass rate
from 300 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 2002 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Trajet is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
  • 34% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Front drive shafts (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Macpherson strut (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.0% fail on Front
    • 0.67% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.67% fail on Condition (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.33% fail on Location
    • 0.33% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
    • 0.33% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.0% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.33% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on ABS
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
        • 0.67% fail on Anti-slip
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.67% fail on Size/type
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Installation check
        • 0.33% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 5.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 8.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on System
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.67% fail on Locking devices (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.67% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.33% fail on Seats
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages