Hyundai Santa Fe MOT Results
Registered in 200553.8% pass rate
from 1,513 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Santa Fe is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.59% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.066% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
2.7% fail on
Springs
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Coil spring (41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.66% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.33% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.26% fail on
Axles
- 0.26% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.99% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.99% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.99% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Direction indicators
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.066% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.66% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.066% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.066% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.066% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.66% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Joints
- 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Bearing housing
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.066% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.066% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.33% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Panel
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.20% fail on
Chassis
- 0.20% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.20% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Tank
- 0.13% fail on Undertray
- 0.066% fail on Bumpers
-
0.066% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.066% fail on Carrier
-
0.066% fail on
Towbar
- 0.066% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.066% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.066% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.066% fail on
Doors
-
0.066% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.066% fail on Door condition
-
0.066% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.066% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.066% fail on Other boot lid component
-
9.3% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.066% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.066% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
(43% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt
- 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.066% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.066% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.066% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.066% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.46% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.066% fail on Brake linings
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.066% fail on Brake drums
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.066% fail on Cable
- 0.066% fail on Lever
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.59% fail on Lever
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.20% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.13% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 0.26% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.066% fail on Windscreen
- 0.066% fail on Window
-
0.066% fail on
View to rear
- 0.066% fail on Mirrors
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
(40% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Locking devices
- 0.066% fail on Drag link end
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Other components
- 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Operation
- 0.066% fail on Pump
- 0.066% fail on Rams
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(89% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.066% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.066% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
1.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.066% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(89% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
- 0.066% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 0.066% fail on Attachment
- 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.46% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.13% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Speedometer (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Santa Fe (2001 - 2006)
Pleasant, relaxing drive. Kitted out generously. V6 makes a good sound. A lot of 4x4 for the money.