Hyundai Matrix MOT Results
Registered in 201068.3% pass rate
from 205 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
-
8.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.49% fail on Joints
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Chassis
- 0.49% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.49% fail on Pipe
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
- 0.49% fail on Passenger's seat
-
7.3% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.98% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.49% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.49% fail on Horn
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension
-
2.9% fail on
Macpherson strut
(16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Sub-frame (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Springs
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Mounting (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Coil spring
-
0.98% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.98% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.9% fail on
Macpherson strut
(16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Brakes
-
2.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
0.49% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.98% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.98% fail on Brake pads
-
0.49% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.49% fail on Cable
- 0.49% fail on Lever
-
0.98% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.49% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.49% fail on Pedal
-
0.49% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
2.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Airbags
- 0.49% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.98% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.98% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.49% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.98% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.98% fail on
Tyres
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Condition
-
0.49% fail on
Steering
-
0.49% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.49% fail on Track rod end
-
0.49% fail on
Steering linkage components