Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2009

60.4% pass rate

from 386 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.2% fail on Headlamps (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.0% fail on Headlamp (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.52% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.52% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.52% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.26% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
11% fail on Brakes
- 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.8% fail on Rbt
      - 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.52% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.26% fail on Rbt
      - 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.52% fail on Brake discs
- 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.26% fail on Pedal
  - 0.26% fail on Hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.26% fail on Lever
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.26% fail on Servos
10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 8.0% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 8.0% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.26% fail on Joints
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.52% fail on Seats
  - 0.52% fail on Passenger's seat (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.26% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.26% fail on Tank
7.8% fail on Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.26% fail on Bonnet
7.3% fail on Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.78% fail on Size/type
7.0% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.8% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Sub-frame (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
5.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.26% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Airbags
  - 0.26% fail on Drivers airbag
3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.52% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.26% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.78% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
2.6% fail on Steering
- 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.3% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
0.26% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Attachment