Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.6% pass rate
from 386 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.26% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Front lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Servos
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Rear wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.26% fail on Components
        • 0.26% fail on Servos
    • 0.26% fail on ABS
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.52% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Rear
    • 0.26% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.26% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.52% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Requirements
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.26% fail on Steering arm
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.78% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.52% fail on Emissions
  • 0.52% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 0.26% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages