Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.6% pass rate
from 1,116 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Sub-frames (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Condition (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (42% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.72% fail on Front
      • 0.27% fail on Rear (74% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.090% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 21% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Components (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Hoses (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.090% fail on Servos
      • 0.81% fail on Leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Operation
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on ABS (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake control components (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.090% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.090% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.1% fail on Front lamps (47% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Rear lamps (91% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.63% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.72% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.090% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.090% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.090% fail on Switch
    • 0.090% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.090% fail on Lamp
  • 13% fail on Tyres (42% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 6.7% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (37% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (57% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
      • 0.18% fail on Drive system (22 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Rams
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Steering control
      • 0.090% fail on Steering column
  • 6.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on System
      • 0.090% fail on Tank
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.090% fail on Requirements
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.81% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.81% fail on Chassis
    • 0.63% fail on Doors
      • 0.63% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.27% fail on Load security (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Bootlid (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.090% fail on Seats
      • 0.090% fail on Passengers
  • 0.72% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.090% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.090% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages