Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2002
44.4% pass rate
from 394 tests in 2020
(16% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Sub-frames (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Sub-frame (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.51% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.51% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Springs
      • 0.25% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.25% fail on Mounting
  • 21% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt
          • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.25% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.51% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.25% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.25% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.76% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.76% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.76% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.76% fail on Doors
      • 0.51% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.51% fail on Door condition
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.25% fail on System
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
    • 0.25% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.25% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Position lamp (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.51% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.4% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Operation
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.76% fail on Airbags (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Drivers airbag (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages