Hyundai Lantra MOT Results
Registered in 200040.4% pass rate
from 52 tests in 2021
(46% worse than other 2000 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Lantra is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 5.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.8% fail on
Chassis
- 3.8% fail on Chassis condition
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.8% fail on
Body
(11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Panel (26 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Bumpers
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
-
1.9% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.9% fail on Door condition
-
1.9% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
1.9% fail on
Seats
- 1.9% fail on Passenger's seat
-
13% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
27% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
15% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 15% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
15% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
3.8% fail on
Sub-frames
- 3.8% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
-
21% fail on
Brakes
- 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
-
9.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.9% fail on Brake fluid
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.9% fail on Cable
-
1.9% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
-
17% fail on
Visibility
- 12% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
-
1.9% fail on
Condition of glass
- 1.9% fail on Windscreen
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth