Hyundai ix35 MOT Results
Registered in 201681.4% pass rate
from 339 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix35 is unusually good or bad.
-
6.2% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.88% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Hand lever (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pedal
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.29% fail on Lever
-
4.1% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
-
4.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.88% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp
-
0.88% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.88% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.29% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.88% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.88% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension
- 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.29% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.29% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Steering
-
0.29% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.29% fail on Track rod end
-
0.29% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment