Hyundai ix35 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.9% pass rate
from 2,955 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix35 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.068% fail on Rear lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.44% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.034% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.068% fail on Battery
    • 0.068% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.068% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.068% fail on Switch
  • 7.2% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Front wheels (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.034% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.068% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.068% fail on Pedal
        • 0.068% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.068% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.068% fail on Lever (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Hydraulic systems (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Components
        • 0.034% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.034% fail on Leaks
    • 0.034% fail on ABS
  • 7.0% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Location (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Anti-roll bars (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on Suspension arms (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Front drive shafts (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.10% fail on Front
      • 0.034% fail on Rear
    • 0.10% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.068% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.068% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.068% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.068% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.034% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.88% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.034% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Size/type
    • 0.034% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.95% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drivers (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers front (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.17% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
      • 0.034% fail on Requirements
    • 0.034% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.034% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.17% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Emissions
    • 0.034% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.034% fail on System
    • 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.034% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.034% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai ix35 (2009 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Comfortable and refined interior. Available with two or four-wheel drive. Low CO2 emissions. Five-year warranty. Generous equipment. Full size spare wheel.

    Search Good Garages