Hyundai ix35 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.1% pass rate
from 3,411 tests in 2020
(9.2% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix35 is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.59% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.088% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.029% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.059% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.059% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.029% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.088% fail on Horn
      • 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.7% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.029% fail on Sub-frame
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.088% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.088% fail on View to rear
      • 0.088% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.029% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.0% fail on Doors (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Driver's door (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Door condition (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shaft (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Bearing housing (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.029% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
    • 0.029% fail on Body
      • 0.029% fail on Panel
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.029% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.76% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Exhaust emissions (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.059% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.70% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Steering linkage components (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.029% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai ix35 (2009 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Comfortable and refined interior. Available with two or four-wheel drive. Low CO2 emissions. Five-year warranty. Generous equipment. Full size spare wheel.

    Search Good Garages