Hyundai ix20 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
90.5% pass rate
from 3,822 tests in 2020
(25% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix20 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Washers
    • 0.078% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.026% fail on View to rear
      • 0.026% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.026% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.21% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.026% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.026% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Size/type
    • 0.026% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.3% fail on Brakes (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.47% fail on Mechanical brake components (67% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.052% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 0.26% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.026% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.026% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.21% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Requirements (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.078% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.052% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.026% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.052% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.026% fail on Body
      • 0.026% fail on Panel
    • 0.026% fail on Doors
      • 0.026% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
  • 0.026% fail on Steering
    • 0.026% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.026% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.026% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.026% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai ix20 (2010 - 2018)
    Good range of efficient chain cam engines. Cheap to run. Good visibility. Easy to get in and out of. Plenty of rear passenger and boot space. Attractively facelifted for 2016 model year with newer engines and transmissions.

    Search Good Garages