Hyundai ix20 MOT Results
Registered in 201685.2% pass rate
from 3,708 tests in 2021
(14% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix20 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.9% fail on
Visibility
(49% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Wipers (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Washers
-
0.027% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.027% fail on Windscreen
-
3.6% fail on
Brakes
(28% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Parking brake performance
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.054% fail on
Plate brake tester
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
-
0.16% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.081% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.24% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs
-
0.054% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.027% fail on Cable
- 0.027% fail on Lever
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.027% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.027% fail on Electronic stability control
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.027% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.40% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.027% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.24% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.24% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.24% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.054% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.054% fail on Position lamp
-
0.054% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.054% fail on Horn
- 0.027% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Tread depth (73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Size/type
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.027% fail on Requirements
-
0.027% fail on
Airbags
- 0.027% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension
(95% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.027% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.027% fail on Ball joint
-
0.027% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.081% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.081% fail on Registration plates
-
0.054% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Body
- 0.027% fail on Other body component
-
0.027% fail on
Doors
-
0.027% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.027% fail on Door condition
-
0.027% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.027% fail on
Body
-
0.027% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.027% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.027% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.027% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.027% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.027% fail on
Exhaust emissions
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai ix20 (2010 - 2018)
Cheap to run. Good visibility. Plenty of rear passenger and boot space. Better engines and transmissions in 2016.