Hyundai ix20 MOT Results

Registered in 2015
84.3% pass rate
from 3,301 tests in 2021
(24% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix20 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.091% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.061% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.030% fail on Window
    • 0.091% fail on View to rear
      • 0.091% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.061% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (83% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.030% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.030% fail on Switch
    • 0.030% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.061% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.030% fail on Cable
        • 0.030% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.091% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.091% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.091% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.061% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.030% fail on Pedal
    • 0.091% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.061% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.061% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.061% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.061% fail on Lever
    • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.030% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.061% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.030% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Size/type
  • 0.70% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.030% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.061% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Steering
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.061% fail on Steering coupling (74 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Universal joint (78 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering play
      • 0.030% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.091% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (92% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Exhaust emissions (94% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.030% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.030% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.030% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.061% fail on Body, chassis, structure (93% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Body
      • 0.030% fail on Panel
    • 0.030% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.030% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.030% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.030% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages