Hyundai ix20 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
76.8% pass rate
from 3,126 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix20 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.7% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp (52% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.032% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.064% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Horn
  • 6.7% fail on Suspension (87% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Coil springs (52% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.096% fail on Rear
      • 0.064% fail on Front
    • 0.096% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.064% fail on Fluid suspension (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Suspension unit (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Front drive shafts (81% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 6.1% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.064% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.032% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Components
        • 0.032% fail on Pipes
    • 0.096% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.096% fail on Mechanical components (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage
      • 0.032% fail on Lever
      • 0.032% fail on Pivot
    • 0.096% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.032% fail on ABS
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (37% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (62% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.032% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Size/type
  • 0.32% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
    • 0.032% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.032% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.29% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Steering
    • 0.16% fail on Steering system
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.064% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 0.032% fail on Attachment
  • 0.032% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai ix20 (2010 - 2018)
    Good range of efficient chain cam engines. Cheap to run. Good visibility. Easy to get in and out of. Plenty of rear passenger and boot space. Attractively facelifted for 2016 model year with newer engines and transmissions.

    Search Good Garages