Hyundai Ioniq MOT Results
Registered in 201790.4% pass rate
from 5,820 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Ioniq is unusually good or bad.
-
3.1% fail on
Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.58% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.069% fail on Windscreen
-
0.017% fail on
View to rear
- 0.017% fail on Mirrors
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
(24% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.034% fail on Size/type
-
1.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Headlamp aim
(51% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.58% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp
- 0.069% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.33% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.31% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.086% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.034% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.069% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.069% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.069% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.069% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.64% fail on
Headlamp aim
(51% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brakes
(26% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(67% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(67% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.052% fail on
Rbt
- 0.034% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.017% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.052% fail on
Rbt
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.22% fail on Brake discs
-
0.17% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake pads (86% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.017% fail on Cable
-
0.22% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake control
(140% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Lever (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.034% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.034% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.017% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.017% fail on Pedal
-
0.017% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(59% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.017% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.052% fail on
Body
- 0.034% fail on Other body component
- 0.017% fail on Panel
-
0.052% fail on
Doors
-
0.034% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.034% fail on Door condition
-
0.017% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.017% fail on Door condition
-
0.034% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.017% fail on Bumpers
-
0.017% fail on
Transmission
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.017% fail on Joints
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.052% fail on
Body
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates
-
0.086% fail on
Steering
-
0.052% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Track rod end
- 0.017% fail on Locking devices
-
0.034% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.034% fail on Steering rack
-
0.052% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.069% fail on
Suspension
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.017% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.034% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review