Hyundai i800 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.0% pass rate
from 586 tests in 2020
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i800 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Servos
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.85% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.34% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.51% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension rod
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Pump (163 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.68% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.34% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages