Hyundai i800 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
53.9% pass rate
from 204 tests in 2017
(41% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i800 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.49% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Battery (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
  • 21% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.98% fail on Operation (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Components
        • 0.98% fail on Pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Electronic stability system (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on ABS
    • 0.98% fail on Restricted movement (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.49% fail on Anti-slip
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.98% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Drag link end
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Passengers other (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Body condition
  • 0.98% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.49% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.49% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 0.98% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 0.49% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.49% fail on Exhaust system

Search Good Garages