Hyundai i30 MOT Results

Registered in 2017

86.4% pass rate

from 6,932 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i30 is unusually good or bad.

5.1% fail on Visibility (39% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Wipers (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers
- 0.10% fail on Bonnet (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Driver's view
- 0.014% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.014% fail on Windscreen
- 0.014% fail on View to rear
  - 0.014% fail on Mirrors
4.2% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
2.3% fail on Brakes
- 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.97% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.95% fail on Brake pads
    - 0.014% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.29% fail on Brake discs
- 0.82% fail on Brake performance (71% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (63% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.46% fail on Rbt (66% worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.087% fail on Rbt
      - 0.072% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      - 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.043% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.043% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.043% fail on Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake control (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Lever
  - 0.043% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.029% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.029% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.029% fail on Brake fluid
  - 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.014% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.014% fail on Anti-lock braking system
2.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.058% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.63% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.56% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.043% fail on Headlamp levelling device
  - 0.029% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.32% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.32% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.058% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.27% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.12% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.087% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.043% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.043% fail on Horn
- 0.029% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
0.43% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.42% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.26% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.16% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.014% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.014% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.17% fail on Registration plates
0.12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Bumpers
- 0.029% fail on Body
  - 0.029% fail on Other body component
- 0.014% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.014% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.014% fail on Doors
  - 0.014% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.014% fail on Door condition
- 0.014% fail on Undertray
0.12% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.087% fail on Attachment
- 0.029% fail on Condition
0.10% fail on Suspension (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.029% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
0.087% fail on Steering
- 0.043% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.043% fail on Steering rack
- 0.014% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.014% fail on Track rod end
- 0.014% fail on Power steering
  - 0.014% fail on Operation
- 0.014% fail on Steering column
- 0.014% fail on Electronic power steering
0.087% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.029% fail on Condition
  - 0.014% fail on Requirements
- 0.043% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp

Read the Honest John Review

Hyundai i30 (2017 on)
Comfortable and refined. Spacious boot. Impressive petrol engines. Good level of standard safety equipment.
Hyundai i30 (2012 - 2017)
Good quality interior, very efficient engines, excellent value for money, good reliability record, plenty of equipment as standard.