Hyundai i30 MOT Results
Registered in 201063.5% pass rate
from 10,965 tests in 2017
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i30 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(44% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
(89% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0091% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.0091% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rear lamps (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on All position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(20% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(20% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Side repeaters (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Individual lamps (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on All direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0091% fail on Switch
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(20% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Fog lamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0091% fail on Switch
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.027% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.018% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0091% fail on Lamp
- 0.0091% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(39% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(26% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Location
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.027% fail on Attachment
- 0.0091% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Wheel bearings
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Front
- 0.064% fail on Rear
-
0.18% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Shock absorbers
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.027% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.018% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.0091% fail on Attachment
- 0.018% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.0091% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.0091% fail on Condition
-
0.0091% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0091% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(26% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Brakes
(53% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Front wheels (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.018% fail on Brake operation
- 0.0091% fail on Parking brake operation
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
(36% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Brake linings
- 0.036% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0091% fail on Fitment
- 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Components
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Hoses
- 0.046% fail on Pipes (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.064% fail on Operation
- 0.064% fail on Leaks
- 0.018% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Components
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.082% fail on ABS (59% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Service brake control components
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Pedal
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0091% fail on Condition
- 0.0091% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.018% fail on
Pedal
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.0091% fail on Cable
- 0.0091% fail on Pivot
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.16% fail on Size/type
- 0.082% fail on Valve stem
- 0.073% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
6.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(38% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Wipers (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.055% fail on Bonnet
- 0.055% fail on Mirrors
-
1.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Passengers front (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Drivers (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Body condition
-
0.0091% fail on
Seats
- 0.0091% fail on Drivers
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Steering
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Steering system
(38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Steering rack (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0091% fail on
Free play
- 0.0091% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0091% fail on Drag link end
-
0.0091% fail on
Other components
- 0.0091% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.027% fail on Locking devices
-
0.018% fail on
Power steering
- 0.018% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.57% fail on
Steering system
(38% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Emissions (58% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.10% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Cap (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.0091% fail on Requirements
- 0.0091% fail on Attachment
-
0.12% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.091% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.0091% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.018% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review