Hyundai i30 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.4% pass rate
from 11,403 tests in 2020
(9.9% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i30 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0088% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (22% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.36% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.32% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Horn (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.018% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.018% fail on Switch
    • 0.018% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.018% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.061% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (54% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Mounting
    • 0.94% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover (32 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0088% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0088% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.061% fail on Sub-frames (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0088% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.018% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0088% fail on Axles
      • 0.0088% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.018% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.018% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0088% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.57% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.088% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0088% fail on Cable
        • 0.0088% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.0088% fail on Pivot
        • 0.0088% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Pedal (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Rigid brake pipes (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.053% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.026% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0088% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.0088% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0088% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0088% fail on Other braking system component
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.018% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.070% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.061% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.061% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (23% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Catch (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0088% fail on Hose
      • 0.0088% fail on Pipe
    • 0.19% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0088% fail on Joints
      • 0.0088% fail on Belts
    • 0.061% fail on Body
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component
      • 0.026% fail on Panel
    • 0.053% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.018% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0088% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0088% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.0088% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0088% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0088% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.0088% fail on Seats
      • 0.0088% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.018% fail on Other components
        • 0.018% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.0088% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Steering play
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.035% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.018% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.018% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0088% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0088% fail on Operation
    • 0.0088% fail on Steering shaft
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (23% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.026% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.70% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Catalyst emissions (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Fluid leaks (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Engine oil leaks (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0088% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0088% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0088% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.33% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment
      • 0.018% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0088% fail on Requirements
    • 0.088% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 0.0088% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0088% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages