Hyundai i20 MOT Results
Registered in 201788.1% pass rate
from 11,813 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i20 is unusually good or bad.
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
(22% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (24% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers (31% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
View to rear
- 0.051% fail on Mirrors
-
0.017% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.017% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0085% fail on Driver's view
-
3.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(26% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(36% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (40% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.87% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.87% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.19% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.093% fail on
Headlamps
(82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.076% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.076% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.076% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.076% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.042% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.025% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.017% fail on Horn
-
0.025% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.017% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.017% fail on Position lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(36% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
(37% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Brakes
(31% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Brake linings
-
0.17% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(51% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake discs (53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Brake drums
-
0.017% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.017% fail on Lever
-
0.82% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0085% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0085% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
-
0.076% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt
- 0.042% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.025% fail on
Plate brake tester
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt
-
0.042% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0085% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.017% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
(17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.0085% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.025% fail on Lever
-
0.017% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.017% fail on Hand lever
-
0.017% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.0085% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0085% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.0085% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0085% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.0085% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0085% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0085% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.0085% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0085% fail on Other components
-
0.96% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.068% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.21% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.059% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.025% fail on Transmission oil leaks (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.017% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.017% fail on Undertray
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates
-
0.093% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Transmission
-
0.042% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.042% fail on Joints
-
0.042% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.025% fail on
Doors
-
0.017% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.017% fail on Door condition
-
0.0085% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0085% fail on Door condition
-
0.017% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.017% fail on
Body
- 0.0085% fail on Panel
- 0.0085% fail on Other body component
-
0.0085% fail on
Seats
- 0.0085% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.042% fail on
Transmission
-
0.085% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.051% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.034% fail on
Seat belts
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Suspension
(94% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Suspension arms
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.017% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Linkage
- 0.0085% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0085% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.0085% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.017% fail on
Suspension arms
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Road Wheels
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Attachment
- 0.0085% fail on Condition
-
0.025% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Steering linkage components
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0085% fail on Track rod end
- 0.0085% fail on Locking devices
-
0.025% fail on
Steering linkage components
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0085% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0085% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review