Hyundai i20 MOT Results
Registered in 201277.3% pass rate
from 8,993 tests in 2017
(8.4% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i20 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(37% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Position lamps
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.056% fail on All position lamps (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Rear lamps (82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (52% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.58% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Battery (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.067% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Horn
-
0.056% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Fog lamp (74% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Tell tale
- 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
-
3.9% fail on
Position lamps
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(42% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (38% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen
- 0.044% fail on Mirrors
-
4.5% fail on
Brakes
(18% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
(99% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Brake operation
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads (19% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs
- 0.067% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.033% fail on Brake linings
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.19% fail on
Components
- 0.18% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Hoses
- 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.011% fail on Operation
-
0.19% fail on
Components
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.056% fail on ABS
-
0.033% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.033% fail on
Pedal
- 0.033% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Pedal
-
0.011% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.011% fail on
Components
- 0.011% fail on Servos
-
0.011% fail on
Components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
(99% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth (39% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
- 0.011% fail on Valve stem
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.75% fail on
Shock absorbers
(50% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.33% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.19% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.19% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.011% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.011% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.19% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.18% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.18% fail on Front (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.044% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.033% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.033% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.011% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.011% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.33% fail on
Seat belts
(88% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.33% fail on
Seat belts
(88% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Passengers front
- 0.14% fail on Body condition (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Seats
- 0.011% fail on Passengers
- 0.011% fail on Drivers
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Steering
-
0.21% fail on
Steering system
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.044% fail on Ball joint
- 0.044% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Steering control
-
0.022% fail on
Steering coupling
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Steering coupling
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Locking devices
-
0.21% fail on
Steering system
-
0.19% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(49% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Registration plate (49% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Emissions
- 0.056% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.011% fail on System
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
- 0.033% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai i20 (2009 - 2015)
Easy to drive and refined. Very well built. Five-year warranty as standard. Neat and tidy styling. Decent room in the back seat. Good economy from entry-level 1.2-litre.