Hyundai i10 MOT Results
Registered in 201788.1% pass rate
from 23,983 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
(16% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers (12% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
View to rear
- 0.042% fail on Mirrors
-
0.017% fail on
Condition of glass
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Windscreen (74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brakes
(38% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(38% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.0042% fail on Brake linings
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0083% fail on Lever
- 0.0042% fail on Cable
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake performance
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0042% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0042% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake performance
(170% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0083% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake performance
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.021% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0042% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.038% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(140% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Parking brake control
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Lever (67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Hand lever
- 0.0042% fail on Pedal
- 0.013% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.0042% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(38% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(25% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.0083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.029% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.14% fail on
Headlamps
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.0042% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.013% fail on Horn
- 0.0042% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.0083% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0083% fail on Switch
-
0.0083% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.0083% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.0083% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0083% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.0042% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0042% fail on Position lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.8% fail on
Tyres
(47% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Size/type (73% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Steering
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Steering gear
(32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Steering rack (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Steering linkage components
(71% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0083% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0042% fail on Locking devices
-
0.0083% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0083% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Steering gear
(32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions (53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0042% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.0042% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Suspension
(79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.054% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.0042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.029% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0083% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.0083% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Springs
(98% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Coil spring
- 0.0042% fail on Mounting
-
0.0083% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0083% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0083% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0042% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Bumpers
-
0.038% fail on
Seats
- 0.033% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.033% fail on
Body
- 0.021% fail on Other body component
- 0.013% fail on Panel
-
0.017% fail on
Transmission
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Undertray
- 0.0042% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.0042% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0042% fail on Pipe
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates (43% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0042% fail on Requirements
- 0.029% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Road Wheels
(87% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0083% fail on Attachment (92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0042% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0042% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai i10 (2014 - 2019)
Stylish, good quality interior. Roomier and more mature than its predecessor. Refined for a small car and decent to drive.