Hyundai i10 MOT Results
Registered in 201685.1% pass rate
from 22,367 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (21% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
View to rear
- 0.063% fail on Mirrors
-
0.022% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.018% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0045% fail on Window
- 0.013% fail on Driver's view
-
4.7% fail on
Brakes
(69% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Brake linings
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Brake drums
-
0.0089% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0089% fail on Lever
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0089% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0089% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0089% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
(9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Service brake imbalance (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake performance
(97% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
(97% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0089% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0089% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
(97% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.098% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.072% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.049% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0089% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.027% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Pedal
- 0.013% fail on Hand lever (73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0089% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0045% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0045% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.0045% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.0045% fail on Lever
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.0089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Stop lamp (33% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.027% fail on Individual direction indicators (67% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamps
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.0089% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.14% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.0045% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.0045% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.027% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.013% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0089% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0045% fail on Horn
-
0.018% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Main beam tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0089% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0089% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0089% fail on
Reversing lamps
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0089% fail on Reversing lamps (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
(38% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Size/type (76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Suspension
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0089% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.058% fail on Shock absorbers (58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0089% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0045% fail on Linkage
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.036% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0089% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0045% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0089% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0045% fail on
Axles
- 0.0045% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.14% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(50% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Seats
- 0.040% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Belts
-
0.018% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Body
- 0.0089% fail on Panel
- 0.0045% fail on Other body component
-
0.0089% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0089% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0045% fail on Pipe
-
0.0045% fail on
Doors
-
0.0045% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0045% fail on Door condition
-
0.0045% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.21% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Spark ignition
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions (58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Spark ignition
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.0045% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Steering
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0045% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0045% fail on Steering arm
- 0.0045% fail on Locking devices
-
0.0045% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0045% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0045% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Registration plates (41% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0045% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.0045% fail on Requirements
- 0.045% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0045% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0045% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.054% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Road Wheels
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Condition
- 0.049% fail on Attachment (65% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai i10 (2014 - 2019)
Stylish, good quality interior. Roomier and more mature than its predecessor. Refined for a small car and decent to drive.