Hyundai i10 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
71.4% pass rate
from 21,660 tests in 2020
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (12% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.055% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0092% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0046% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on All direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Switch
    • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.028% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0092% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0092% fail on Switch
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0046% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0046% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0046% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.069% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.018% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0046% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0092% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0046% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0046% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0046% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0046% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0046% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (16% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (13% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads (13% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0046% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.051% fail on Cable
        • 0.037% fail on Lever
        • 0.0092% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0046% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.0046% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Anti-lock braking system (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.055% fail on Pedal (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.037% fail on Flexible brake hoses (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0046% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0046% fail on Other components
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.092% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.032% fail on View to rear (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Mirrors (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Condition of glass (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Windscreen (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0092% fail on Bonnet (92% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joints (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint dust cover (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.037% fail on Other suspension component (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0092% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0046% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.028% fail on Springs (99% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Mounting
        • 0.0092% fail on Coil spring (100% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.018% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0092% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0092% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.014% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Spark ignition (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions (29% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0092% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.023% fail on Compression ignition (98% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0092% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.0046% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0046% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.95% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.014% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0092% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0092% fail on Other components
        • 0.0092% fail on Steering component
    • 0.042% fail on Steering play
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0092% fail on Power steering (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0092% fail on Operation
    • 0.0046% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0046% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0046% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.89% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0092% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0046% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0046% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.62% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0046% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.0092% fail on Belts
      • 0.0046% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0046% fail on Joints
    • 0.055% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.037% fail on Doors (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.023% fail on Door condition
      • 0.014% fail on Front passenger's door (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Seats
      • 0.028% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0046% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.023% fail on Fuel system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Tank
    • 0.023% fail on Body (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Other body component (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0092% fail on Panel
    • 0.0092% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0092% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0092% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.0046% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0046% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0046% fail on Undertray
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates (51% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0046% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0046% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai i10 (2008 - 2014)
    Cheap to own. All models have airc on, five seatbelts and flat folding rear seats. Rides and handles quite well for its size. 99g/km Blue model from early 2011.

    Search Good Garages