Hyundai i10 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.8% pass rate
from 18,488 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0054% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Battery (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Individual lamps (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0054% fail on Lamp
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.011% fail on Bonnet (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Mirrors (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (16% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Front wheels (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.022% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.0054% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (15% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Brake calipers (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.52% fail on Components
        • 0.49% fail on Pipes (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.0054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.049% fail on Leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.0054% fail on Operation
    • 0.32% fail on ABS (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Fitment
    • 0.049% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.049% fail on Pedal
        • 0.049% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.043% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.022% fail on Cable
      • 0.016% fail on Lever
      • 0.0054% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.0054% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.0054% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0054% fail on Components
        • 0.0054% fail on Pipes
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.054% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.3% fail on Suspension (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.35% fail on Front (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Rear (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0054% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Front drive shafts (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0054% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.092% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Front suspension joints (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Location
      • 0.011% fail on Condition (100% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 0.016% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.011% fail on Subframe mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.0054% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.0054% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.0054% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.0054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0054% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.0054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 0.90% fail on Steering
    • 0.88% fail on Steering system
      • 0.64% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Free play
        • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0054% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.016% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.0054% fail on Steering control
      • 0.0054% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.0054% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.75% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.097% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.0054% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0054% fail on System
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate (36% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.097% fail on Road Wheels (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Attachment (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.092% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Body condition (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Doors (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Drivers
    • 0.022% fail on Seats
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers
    • 0.0054% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.0054% fail on Load security
      • 0.0054% fail on Bootlid
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai i10 (2008 - 2014)
    Cheap to own. All models have airc on, five seatbelts and flat folding rear seats. Rides and handles quite well for its size. 99g/km Blue model from early 2011.

    Search Good Garages