Hyundai i10 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
71.2% pass rate
from 18,896 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (6.3% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear lamps (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0053% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamps (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.011% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.49% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on All direction indicators (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.032% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0053% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.0053% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
    • 0.064% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.021% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components (11% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Components (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Pipes (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Hoses (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.095% fail on Leaks
      • 0.053% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.0053% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on ABS
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.090% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.090% fail on Pedal
        • 0.074% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 0.085% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.079% fail on Cable
      • 0.0053% fail on Lever
    • 0.0053% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.0053% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.0053% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0053% fail on Leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Windscreen (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Mirrors (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0053% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (25% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0053% fail on Condition
      • 0.0053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.64% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Rear (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Front suspension joints (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Front drive shafts (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0053% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0053% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.058% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0053% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.016% fail on Coil springs (100% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Condition (100% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0053% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.0053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0053% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0053% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 0.61% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Emissions (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.0053% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0053% fail on Cap
  • 0.52% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.35% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.026% fail on Requirements
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment
      • 0.016% fail on Installation check (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0053% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.17% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0053% fail on Free play
        • 0.0053% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.016% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.016% fail on Power steering (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
      • 0.0053% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.016% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate (45% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Doors (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers front (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Body condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Seats (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Passengers
      • 0.0053% fail on Drivers
    • 0.0053% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.0053% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.0053% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0053% fail on Chassis
  • 0.095% fail on Road Wheels (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai i10 (2008 - 2014)
    Cheap to own. All models have airc on, five seatbelts and flat folding rear seats. Rides and handles quite well for its size. 99g/km Blue model from early 2011.

    Search Good Garages