MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » i10 » 2009

Hyundai i10 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.9% pass rate
from 21,158 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.74% fail on Electrical equipment (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Battery(ies) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
      • 0.043% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on All direction indicators (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0047% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.099% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0095% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0047% fail on Switch
    • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0047% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0047% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.0047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0095% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0095% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0047% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Cable (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Lever
        • 0.0047% fail on Pivot
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.77% fail on Anti-lock braking system (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Pedal
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.028% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0047% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.038% fail on Flexible brake hoses (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0047% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0047% fail on Leaks
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Suspension arm (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.64% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0047% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0047% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.080% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0047% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.061% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0047% fail on Axles
      • 0.0047% fail on Axle
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (19% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on View to rear (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Mirrors (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Condition of glass (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.014% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0047% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (11% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Catalyst emissions (38% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0095% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0047% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0047% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.0047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.043% fail on Compression ignition (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0047% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0047% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0047% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0047% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0047% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0047% fail on Joints
      • 0.0047% fail on Belts
    • 0.080% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.066% fail on Body
      • 0.033% fail on Panel
      • 0.033% fail on Other body component
    • 0.061% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.043% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.043% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Doors (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's door (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Front passenger's door (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Door condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Other passenger's door (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Door condition (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0047% fail on Catch
    • 0.033% fail on Fuel system (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0095% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Tank
      • 0.0047% fail on Hose
    • 0.014% fail on Seats (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.0095% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0095% fail on Engine mounting (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0047% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0047% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.71% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.033% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0047% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0047% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0047% fail on Other components
        • 0.0047% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Operation
    • 0.019% fail on Steering play
      • 0.019% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.014% fail on Power steering (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Operation
      • 0.0047% fail on Other components
    • 0.0095% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0095% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0047% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0047% fail on Steering column
  • 0.69% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Requirements
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Attachment (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.0095% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0095% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0047% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.0047% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.0047% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0047% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai i10 (2008 - 2014)
    Cheap to own. All models have airc on, five seatbelts and flat folding rear seats. Rides and handles quite well for its size. 99g/km Blue model from early 2011.

    Search Good Garages