Hyundai i10 MOT Results
Registered in 200971.2% pass rate
from 18,896 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(6.3% better than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Position lamps
(11% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Front lamps (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rear lamps (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0053% fail on All position lamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Headlamps
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.011% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.49% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.011% fail on All direction indicators (92% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Tell tale
- 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.032% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0053% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0053% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
- 0.064% fail on Valve stem
-
6.3% fail on
Brakes
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rear wheels (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Front wheels
- 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.021% fail on Brake operation
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
(11% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake calipers (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Components
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Pipes (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Hoses (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.095% fail on Leaks
- 0.053% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.0053% fail on Operation
-
0.95% fail on
Components
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on ABS
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.090% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
- 0.074% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.016% fail on Condition
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
-
0.085% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.079% fail on Cable
- 0.0053% fail on Lever
- 0.0053% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.0053% fail on Additional braking devices
-
0.0053% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0053% fail on Leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers (25% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen (39% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Mirrors (57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0053% fail on Bonnet
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (20% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (30% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Linkage condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0053% fail on Condition
- 0.0053% fail on Attachment
-
0.64% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Wheel bearings
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Rear (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Front suspension joints (45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Shock absorbers
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0053% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.0053% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.0053% fail on Condition
-
0.037% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.037% fail on Condition
-
0.016% fail on
Coil springs
(100% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Condition (100% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.0053% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.0053% fail on Attachment
-
0.0053% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.0053% fail on Subframe mounting
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Emissions (35% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0053% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0053% fail on Cap
-
0.52% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.026% fail on Requirements
- 0.026% fail on Attachment
-
0.016% fail on
Installation check
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.0053% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.17% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.28% fail on
Steering
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.10% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0053% fail on
Free play
- 0.0053% fail on Steering rack
- 0.016% fail on Steering operation
-
0.016% fail on
Power steering
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Operation
- 0.0053% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.016% fail on Locking devices
-
0.24% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate (45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Doors
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Drivers
- 0.011% fail on Passengers front (84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Body condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.026% fail on
Seats
(71% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Passengers
- 0.0053% fail on Drivers
- 0.0053% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.0053% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0053% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.0053% fail on Chassis
-
0.042% fail on
Doors
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Road Wheels
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai i10 (2008 - 2014)
Cheap to own. All models have airc on, five seatbelts and flat folding rear seats. Rides and handles quite well for its size. 99g/km Blue model from early 2011.