Hyundai Getz MOT Results

Registered in 2009

60.2% pass rate

from 447 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.45% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.67% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.67% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.67% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
8.9% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.22% fail on Linkage
  - 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.45% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.89% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.89% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.45% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.22% fail on Ball joint
8.7% fail on Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 0.67% fail on Bonnet
- 0.45% fail on View to rear
  - 0.45% fail on Mirrors
8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 6.3% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.45% fail on Body
  - 0.22% fail on Panel
  - 0.22% fail on Other body component
- 0.22% fail on Chassis
  - 0.22% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.22% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.22% fail on Tank
7.6% fail on Brakes
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.45% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.89% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.89% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.89% fail on Brake pads
- 0.89% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.22% fail on Hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.22% fail on Lever
5.1% fail on Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition
2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.5% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.89% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.89% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.67% fail on Condition
  - 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
0.45% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.22% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.22% fail on Locking devices