Hyundai Getz MOT Results
Registered in 200860.0% pass rate
from 5,269 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.46% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.46% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.019% fail on Horn
-
0.36% fail on
Position lamps
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.019% fail on Switch
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(36% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joints (61% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Linkage (75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.076% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.38% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (61% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Other suspension component
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
-
0.057% fail on
Springs
(99% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Mounting
-
0.057% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Axles
- 0.019% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.019% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
9.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Prop shafts
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (41% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.019% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.019% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.076% fail on
Body
- 0.057% fail on Other body component
- 0.019% fail on Panel
-
0.057% fail on
Fuel system
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Tank
-
0.038% fail on
Chassis
- 0.038% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.038% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.038% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.038% fail on
Doors
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.019% fail on Door condition
-
0.019% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.019% fail on Door condition
-
0.019% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.038% fail on
Seats
- 0.019% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.019% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.019% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.019% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.9% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
(41% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
0.095% fail on
View to rear
- 0.076% fail on Mirrors
- 0.019% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.057% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.057% fail on Windscreen
- 0.019% fail on Driver's view
-
8.3% fail on
Brakes
(17% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.076% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.57% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.55% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.019% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.55% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake performance
(77% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs (51% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(40% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Hand lever
- 0.038% fail on Pedal
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake control
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Lever (66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.095% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.057% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.038% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.038% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Other braking system component (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (39% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.36% fail on
Compression ignition
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.095% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.019% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.019% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.49% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.46% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.038% fail on Other leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Locking devices
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
- 0.019% fail on Drag link end
-
0.46% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.019% fail on Other components
-
0.11% fail on
Steering gear
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Steering play
- 0.057% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Steering column
-
0.63% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.80% fail on Registration plates (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(51% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Airbags
- 0.038% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.61% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.019% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.019% fail on
Doors
- 0.019% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.019% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.