Hyundai Getz MOT Results
Registered in 200551.6% pass rate
from 5,139 tests in 2021
(9.7% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
8.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
- 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.039% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Sub-frame (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.74% fail on Suspension arm (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings (47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Macpherson strut
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.18% fail on
Other suspension component
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint
- 0.058% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.058% fail on Ball joint
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.039% fail on
Springs
(99% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Bonded suspension units
- 0.019% fail on Bonded suspension unit
- 0.019% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.019% fail on
Bonded suspension units
-
0.019% fail on
Axles
- 0.019% fail on Axle
-
8.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(98% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Prop shafts
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.41% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.33% fail on
Sub-frame
(13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Sub-frame condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Panel
- 0.039% fail on Other body component
-
0.21% fail on
Chassis
- 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Tank
- 0.039% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Seats
- 0.078% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.058% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.039% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.019% fail on Bracket
-
0.019% fail on
Doors
-
0.019% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.019% fail on Door condition
-
0.019% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.019% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.019% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.019% fail on
Cabs
- 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.54% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on All position lamps
-
0.54% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.039% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.039% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Direction indicators
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.097% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.019% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.019% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.019% fail on Switch
- 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Wipers (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
0.058% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.058% fail on Windscreen
- 0.039% fail on Driver's view
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(22% better than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (25% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.019% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.019% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
0.78% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake performance
(88% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Brake linings
-
0.53% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Brake discs (57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.16% fail on Hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Pedal
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake control
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Lever (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.078% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.058% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.019% fail on Servos
- 0.019% fail on Valves
-
0.078% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.078% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.039% fail on Flexible brake hoses (88% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.019% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.019% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(48% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.019% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.47% fail on
Compression ignition
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.019% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
9.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.019% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.019% fail on Sound deadening material
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
-
2.4% fail on
Steering
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Ball joint
- 0.058% fail on Locking devices
- 0.019% fail on Drag link end
-
0.60% fail on
Power steering
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.019% fail on Pump
-
0.43% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Steering box
- 0.078% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Steering play
- 0.039% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Steering wheel
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(46% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
- 0.019% fail on Requirements
- 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.91% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.90% fail on Registration plates
- 0.019% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
- 0.039% fail on Condition
-
0.039% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.039% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.