Hyundai Getz MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.7% pass rate
from 8,271 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear lamps (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.97% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.073% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.88% fail on Battery (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on All direction indicators (85% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Horn (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.036% fail on Switch
    • 0.012% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.073% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.036% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Presence
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Sub-frames (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.66% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Front
      • 0.048% fail on Rear (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension joints (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.036% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Axles
      • 0.024% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.024% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Brakes (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Components (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Pipes (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Hoses (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Leaks
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.036% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.012% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.99% fail on ABS
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Restricted movement (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Fuel system (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Cap (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on System (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Pipe
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.024% fail on Free play (82% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
    • 0.085% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.073% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.048% fail on Requirements
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.66% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Body condition
    • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis
    • 0.097% fail on Seats
      • 0.097% fail on Passengers
    • 0.060% fail on Body security
    • 0.036% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.012% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.012% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Attachment (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
    Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.

    Search Good Garages