Hyundai Getz MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.3% pass rate
from 5,791 tests in 2017
(4.4% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp (44% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.74% fail on Rear lamps (61% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (24% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.017% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on All direction indicators (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Horn (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
      • 0.017% fail on Lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 25% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Couplings
      • 0.10% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
    • 3.2% fail on Sub-frames (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (18 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (27% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.62% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Rear (92% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Location
    • 0.035% fail on Trailing arms (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.017% fail on Accumulator
    • 0.017% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Components (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Pipes (99% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Hoses (92% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Rear wheels (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake imbalance (47% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components (29% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.017% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.017% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.86% fail on ABS
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.017% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Emissions (83% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (78% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system (73% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.052% fail on Cap (81% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (20% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.29% fail on Windscreen (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (27% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering system (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Free play
        • 0.069% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.052% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.035% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Operation (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Pump
      • 0.017% fail on Drive system
      • 0.017% fail on Rams
    • 0.12% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Steering control
      • 0.017% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.017% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts (29% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
    • 0.45% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.10% fail on Doors (83% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Passengers other (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.086% fail on Load security
      • 0.035% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.035% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.017% fail on Access panel
    • 0.069% fail on Body security
    • 0.035% fail on Seats (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Passengers
    • 0.017% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate (40% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels (56% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment (55% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
    Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.

    Search Good Garages