Hyundai Getz MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.1% pass rate
from 601 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.00% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.67% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.67% fail on Front
    • 0.67% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.50% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Components (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.50% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.83% fail on ABS
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Cap
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.0% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 8.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering system (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.33% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.17% fail on Free play
        • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.83% fail on Power steering
      • 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pump
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.33% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.33% fail on Chassis
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
    • 0.17% fail on Load security
      • 0.17% fail on Bootlid
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
    Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.

    Search Good Garages