Hyundai Getz MOT Results
Registered in 200249.1% pass rate
from 601 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.0% fail on Front lamps
- 1.00% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.67% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(60% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
3.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.67% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.67% fail on Condition
-
0.67% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.67% fail on Front
- 0.67% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.50% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.17% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Components
(62% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.50% fail on Leaks
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
9.7% fail on
Components
(62% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs
- 0.83% fail on ABS
- 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
-
9.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(62% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Cap
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.0% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 0.33% fail on Windscreen
- 0.33% fail on Mirrors
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 8.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Size/type
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
-
3.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.67% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
(46% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Steering system
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.33% fail on Drag link end
-
0.17% fail on
Free play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.17% fail on Steering arm
-
0.83% fail on
Power steering
- 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Pump
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
-
1.8% fail on
Steering system
(58% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.2% fail on Body condition
-
0.33% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.33% fail on Chassis
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
0.17% fail on
Load security
- 0.17% fail on Bootlid
-
2.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate
- 0.17% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.