Hyundai Getz MOT Results
Registered in 200248.1% pass rate
from 235 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(89% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.43% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.43% fail on
Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.43% fail on Bumpers
-
0.43% fail on
Body
- 0.43% fail on Panel
-
0.43% fail on
Load security
-
0.43% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.43% fail on Other tailgate component
-
0.43% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.43% fail on
Cabs
- 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.8% fail on
Transmission
(170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.85% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.85% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.85% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.43% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
- 8.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.85% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt
- 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.85% fail on
Rbt
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.43% fail on Brake linings
-
0.43% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.85% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 8.5% fail on Wipers (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Washers
-
0.43% fail on
View to rear
- 0.43% fail on Mirrors
-
8.5% fail on
Tyres
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Size/type
-
7.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
6.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.85% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.85% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
0.85% fail on
Power steering
- 0.85% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Other components
-
0.43% fail on
Steering play
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.85% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.43% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.