MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Getz » 2002

Hyundai Getz MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.8% pass rate
from 430 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Getz is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.93% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
    • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.23% fail on Chassis
      • 0.23% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Panel
    • 0.23% fail on Load security
      • 0.23% fail on Loading door
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.70% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.70% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.70% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai Getz (2002 - 2008)
    Bright, roomy cabin. Rear seat folds to create a flat load floor. Peppy performance. Good provision of convenience and safety kit. Decent ride. Goof (for its day) 4-Star NCAP safety rating.

    Search Good Garages