Hyundai Elantra MOT Results
Registered in 200448.4% pass rate
from 62 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Elantra is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(200% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads
-
3.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 3.2% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.6% fail on Cable
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 4.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.6% fail on Lever
-
23% fail on
Brake performance
(200% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
- 9.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.6% fail on Linkage
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.8% fail on
Sub-frames
(7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
- 1.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Suspension arm
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.6% fail on Electrical wiring
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
8.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Sub-frame
- 1.6% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.6% fail on Joints
-
1.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.6% fail on
Cabs
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.6% fail on Condition