Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.0% pass rate
from 1,438 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.070% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.42% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Lever
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.070% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.070% fail on Lever
    • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
  • 13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Steering gear (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Steering rack (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.070% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rams (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering column (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.070% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.070% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.070% fail on Steering play
      • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.14% fail on Horn
      • 0.070% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 7.2% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage
      • 0.070% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.070% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.070% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.070% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.070% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.070% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.070% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.070% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.35% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Catch
    • 0.28% fail on Transmission (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.070% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.070% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.070% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.070% fail on Tank
  • 0.70% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages