Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.9% pass rate
from 1,394 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Hub components (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake calipers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Components (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Leaks
    • 0.65% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on ABS
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.072% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear lamps (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.072% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.93% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Battery
    • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.36% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.072% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.072% fail on Switch
    • 0.072% fail on Horn
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 7.7% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Steering system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Steering rack (42 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.072% fail on Other components
        • 0.072% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rams (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Steering control
      • 0.072% fail on Steering column
    • 0.072% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.072% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.072% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.072% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front
    • 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.072% fail on Condition
    • 0.072% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.072% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.072% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.072% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 2.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.86% fail on Emissions
    • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.72% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.65% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.072% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.072% fail on Requirements
  • 0.86% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.072% fail on Body security
    • 0.072% fail on Body condition
    • 0.072% fail on Doors
      • 0.072% fail on Drivers
    • 0.072% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages