MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Coupe » 2008

Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2008
60.1% pass rate
from 1,528 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.065% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.065% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Hub components (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Brake pads (63% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (95% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (77% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components (75% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
        • 0.065% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.33% fail on Leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Operation
    • 0.39% fail on ABS
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.065% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.065% fail on Cable
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear lamps (71% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (39% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.065% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.52% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.065% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.065% fail on Lamp
  • 8.8% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Steering rack (25 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (51% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.59% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Suspension (71% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.46% fail on Front
      • 0.39% fail on Rear
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
      • 0.065% fail on Location
    • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Front drive shafts (93% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.065% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.065% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
    • 0.065% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 3.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.065% fail on Hose
  • 0.79% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.72% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.65% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.065% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.065% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
  • 0.59% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.20% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.065% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages