Hyundai Coupe MOT Results
Registered in 200550.8% pass rate
from 1,271 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(76% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(76% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.079% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Brake performance not tested (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
-
5.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(80% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Relay lever (75 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Pivot
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Hand lever
- 0.16% fail on Pedal
-
0.39% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.31% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.079% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.31% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Additional braking device
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.24% fail on Lever
- 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Horn
- 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.87% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.079% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.079% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.16% fail on Position lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.16% fail on Switch
-
0.079% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(21% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Linkage
- 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.079% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.87% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.79% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.24% fail on
Springs
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.079% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.079% fail on Other suspension component
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(43% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Joints (41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.079% fail on Joints
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Body
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Other body component
-
0.71% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.63% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.079% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.079% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.55% fail on
Chassis
- 0.55% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
-
0.39% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.079% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.24% fail on Bumpers
-
0.16% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.079% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.079% fail on Tank
- 0.079% fail on Undertray
-
10.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(48% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(95% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Compression ignition
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(95% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 0.55% fail on Bonnet
-
0.24% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.079% fail on Locking devices
-
0.79% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.79% fail on Steering rack
-
0.31% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.079% fail on Operation
- 0.079% fail on Steering wheel
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.47% fail on
Seat belts
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.079% fail on
Airbags
- 0.079% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.71% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.55% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Hyundai Coupe (2002 - 2009)
Good-looking coupe that's packed with kit. Drives well, particularly the V6 model. All offer keen value.