Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2003
43.4% pass rate
from 1,033 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 26% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 22% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (70% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Lever
        • 0.097% fail on Linkage
    • 2.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.87% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.77% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.097% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.097% fail on Other components
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp (44% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.097% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.97% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.097% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.097% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.097% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Joints
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Catch (62 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition
        • 0.097% fail on Catch
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.87% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.48% fail on Sub-frame (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Sub-frame condition (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Chassis
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.48% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Panel
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.097% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.097% fail on System
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (42% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.097% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.19% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.097% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.097% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (82% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.097% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.097% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Other leaks
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.29% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.87% fail on Power steering
      • 0.58% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.097% fail on Other components
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.097% fail on Steering box
    • 0.19% fail on Steering wheel (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts (61% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (74% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Airbags
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Attachment
  • 0.097% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.097% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.097% fail on Speed limiter
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages