MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Coupe » 2000

Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2000
41.1% pass rate
from 482 tests in 2017
(20% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.21% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.7% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
  • 28% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 15% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 26% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 9.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Components
        • 8.5% fail on Pipes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Hoses
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.62% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.41% fail on Brake back plates (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on ABS
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Fitment
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Tyres (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 6.0% fail on Condition (62% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Emissions
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
      • 0.21% fail on System
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering system (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drive system
      • 0.21% fail on Rams
    • 0.21% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
  • 5.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages