Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2000

44.8% pass rate

from 268 tests in 2020

(19% worse than other 2000 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 6.0% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.37% fail on Dipswitch
  - 0.37% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 6.0% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 6.0% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 3.4% fail on Position lamps
  - 3.4% fail on Position lamp
- 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.37% fail on Horn
- 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
23% fail on Brakes (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 13% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 6.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    - 0.37% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 5.6% fail on Rbt
      - 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.75% fail on Plate brake tester (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.75% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
- 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.2% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.75% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.75% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.75% fail on Cable
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.1% fail on Lever
- 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.37% fail on Pedal
  - 0.37% fail on Hand lever
- 0.75% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.75% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
22% fail on Suspension
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.5% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.75% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.75% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
  - 1.1% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.75% fail on Springs
  - 0.37% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.37% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.37% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.37% fail on Ball joint
15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 5.6% fail on Transmission
  - 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
    - 5.2% fail on Joints
  - 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.37% fail on Joints
- 3.0% fail on Chassis (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.5% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.75% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  - 0.37% fail on Pipe
  - 0.37% fail on System
- 1.1% fail on Body
  - 0.37% fail on Body condition
  - 0.37% fail on Panel
  - 0.37% fail on Other body component
- 0.37% fail on Bumpers
- 0.37% fail on Seats
  - 0.37% fail on Driver's seat
10% fail on Visibility
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 0.37% fail on Driver's view
- 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.37% fail on Windscreen
7.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 7.5% fail on Spark ignition
    - 7.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
6.7% fail on Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.1% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.75% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.37% fail on Airbags
  - 0.37% fail on Passengers airbag
2.2% fail on Steering
- 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.75% fail on Locking devices (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.37% fail on Steering rack
1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates
0.37% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.37% fail on Speed limiter
  - 0.37% fail on Speed limiter
0.37% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.37% fail on Anchorages