Hyundai Atoz MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.0% pass rate
from 292 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Matched pair
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.68% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
    • 6.2% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Other passenger's door (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Driver's door (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.68% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.34% fail on Hose
      • 0.34% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Towbar
      • 0.34% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.34% fail on Other towbar components
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Sub-frame (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.68% fail on Springs
      • 0.68% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.68% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Requirements
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.68% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.68% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages