Hyundai Atoz MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.8% pass rate
from 455 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.22% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.66% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front
    • 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Anti-roll bars (91% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.4% fail on Components
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes
        • 0.22% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
      • 0.66% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Condition
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.2% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Passengers front (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis
    • 0.44% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
  • 4.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Cap
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.44% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Requirements
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages