MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Atoz » 2000

Hyundai Atoz MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.1% pass rate
from 140 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 9.3% fail on Sub-frames (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Sub-frame (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.7% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on Springs
      • 0.71% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.71% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.71% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.71% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.71% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.71% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake fluid (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.71% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.71% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.71% fail on Brake pads
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Other passenger's door (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Door condition (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition
      • 0.71% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.71% fail on Chassis
      • 0.71% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.71% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.71% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.71% fail on Bumpers
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.71% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.71% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.71% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages