MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Atoz » 1999

Hyundai Atoz MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.4% pass rate
from 235 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 1999 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Hand lever
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.43% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Other passenger's door (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Door condition (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.43% fail on Door condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.85% fail on Sub-frame (28 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Sub-frame condition (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Chassis
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.85% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.43% fail on Springs
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.43% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.43% fail on Rams
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.43% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages