MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Atoz » 1998

Hyundai Atoz MOT Results

Registered in 1998
46.1% pass rate
from 102 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (62% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.98% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.98% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Other suspension component
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.9% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 13% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.98% fail on Door condition
  • 16% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.98% fail on View to rear
      • 0.98% fail on Mirrors
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.98% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.98% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.98% fail on Operation
    • 0.98% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.98% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions

Search Good Garages