Hyundai Amica MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.6% pass rate
from 1,176 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Amica is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.085% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (84% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.085% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.085% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Driver's door (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Door condition (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame condition (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Hose
      • 0.17% fail on System
      • 0.085% fail on Pipe
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.085% fail on Body condition
      • 0.085% fail on Other body component
    • 0.085% fail on Chassis
      • 0.085% fail on Chassis condition
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.085% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.085% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.085% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt
          • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.085% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.085% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.085% fail on Lever
    • 0.085% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.085% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.085% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Suspension arm (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.085% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.94% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.085% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.94% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Springs
      • 0.085% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.085% fail on Coil spring
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.085% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.085% fail on Components
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.085% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.085% fail on Condition
    • 0.085% fail on Attachment
  • 0.085% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.085% fail on Passenger grab handles

Search Good Garages