Hyundai Amica MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.4% pass rate
from 1,520 tests in 2017
(9.0% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Amica is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (25% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps (25% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front lamps (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear lamps (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Fog lamp (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.066% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.066% fail on Switch
    • 0.79% fail on Horn
    • 0.066% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.066% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.066% fail on Lamp
    • 0.066% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Couplings
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting (44% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
      • 0.066% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.066% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.066% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.066% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
    • 0.066% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 4.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.20% fail on Hoses (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.66% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.066% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.066% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake control components (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.066% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Tyres (37% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.066% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.066% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.46% fail on Cap
      • 0.13% fail on System
      • 0.066% fail on Tank
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.86% fail on Body condition (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis
    • 0.066% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.066% fail on Body security
    • 0.066% fail on Seats
      • 0.066% fail on Passengers
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.066% fail on Steering control
      • 0.066% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.066% fail on Power steering
      • 0.066% fail on Other components
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.72% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (86% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (88% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (88% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages