Hyundai Accent MOT Results
Registered in 200556.0% pass rate
from 1,084 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Position lamps
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Front lamps (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.092% fail on All position lamps
- 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Direction indicators
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.092% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Fog lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Horn
- 0.092% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(21% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.092% fail on Couplings
-
0.28% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
(90% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Macpherson strut
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.65% fail on Front
- 0.18% fail on Rear (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.18% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Condition
- 0.092% fail on Location
-
0.092% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
0.092% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.92% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Components
(54% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Pipes (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Hoses
- 0.092% fail on Cylinders
- 0.83% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Components
(54% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on ABS
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
- 0.18% fail on Valve stem
-
8.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 0.46% fail on Windscreen
- 0.092% fail on Bonnet
- 0.092% fail on Mirrors
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.8% fail on Emissions
- 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.092% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.092% fail on Pipe
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.092% fail on Steering arm
-
0.28% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Rams (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Operation
- 0.092% fail on Other components
- 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
0.092% fail on
Installation check
- 0.092% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.18% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.92% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.55% fail on
Doors
- 0.37% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Passengers front
- 0.092% fail on Passengers other
-
0.18% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.18% fail on Chassis
- 0.18% fail on Body condition
-
0.55% fail on
Doors
-
0.092% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.092% fail on Condition