MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Accent » 2002

Hyundai Accent MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.8% pass rate
from 1,545 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.065% fail on Brake operation
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Components (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Pipes (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.065% fail on Pump
      • 1.6% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Wheel cylinder (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
        • 0.26% fail on Condition
        • 0.26% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.39% fail on ABS (65% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear lamps (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.065% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.6% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.065% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.71% fail on Horn
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual lamps (81% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.065% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Couplings
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.065% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.45% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment
    • 0.065% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.065% fail on Condition
    • 0.065% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Emissions
    • 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.84% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on System
      • 0.26% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.065% fail on Tank
  • 3.5% fail on Steering (29% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.065% fail on Operation
      • 0.065% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.065% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Steering control
      • 0.065% fail on Steering lock
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.58% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
    • 0.065% fail on Engine mountings
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (92% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages