Hyundai Accent MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.3% pass rate
from 722 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.7% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.97% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.14% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Horn
  • 25% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10.0% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front wheels (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 6.8% fail on Pipes (64% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses (82% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.55% fail on Leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on ABS
    • 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Front drive shafts (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.9% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (50% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.97% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.42% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.14% fail on Location
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Emissions (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.1% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.69% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.42% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages