Hyundai Accent MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.8% pass rate
from 267 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Suspension arm (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.37% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.37% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.75% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Cable
    • 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.75% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.75% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.5% fail on Joints
    • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Chassis
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Other body component
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.75% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
      • 0.37% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
    • 0.37% fail on Floor
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
  • 9.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Seat belts (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.37% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.37% fail on NOx sensor
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.75% fail on Steering (81% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.37% fail on Other components
    • 0.37% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.37% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages