Hyundai Accent MOT Results

Registered in 1999
47.7% pass rate
from 472 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Accent is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.8% fail on Component mounting (62% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.64% fail on Front
      • 0.42% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Battery (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.21% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.64% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 7.4% fail on Pipes (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
      • 0.64% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal linkage
        • 0.21% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Requirements
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (41% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions (53% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.21% fail on System
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.85% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.64% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.64% fail on Chassis
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (53% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.64% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Pump
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages