Honda Shuttle MOT Results
Registered in 199855.1% pass rate
from 274 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Shuttle is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
8.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.7% fail on Front lamps (87% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.73% fail on Battery
- 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
8.8% fail on
Position lamps
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
5.5% fail on
Hub components
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.8% fail on Front wheels
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.36% fail on Brake imbalance
- 3.6% fail on ABS (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.8% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Components
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pipes
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.5% fail on
Hub components
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
(78% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting (72% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.73% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.73% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.36% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.36% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.36% fail on Rear
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.3% fail on Emissions
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.36% fail on Windscreen
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.6% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.36% fail on Locking devices
-
2.6% fail on
Steering system
-
2.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(75% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.73% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
(83% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.73% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(84% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Body condition
-
0.36% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.36% fail on Chassis
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.36% fail on Attachment