Honda Prelude MOT Results

Registered in 1994
52.6% pass rate
from 95 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Prelude is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Battery
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 7.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake calipers (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 4.2% fail on ABS (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
        • 1.1% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment
    • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.2% fail on Component mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Radius arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (81% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.3% fail on Steering system
      • 6.3% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 1.1% fail on Rams
    • 1.1% fail on Rear wheel steering
      • 1.1% fail on Components
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.2% fail on Body condition
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis
    • 2.1% fail on Body security (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages