Honda Jazz MOT Results

Registered in 2010
83.1% pass rate
from 19,485 tests in 2017
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Rear lamps (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Individual lamps (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on All direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0051% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Fog lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Horn (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Rear reflectors (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0051% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.015% fail on Bonnet (83% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Size/type (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0051% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.1% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components (15% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.0051% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.74% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Rear wheels (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front wheels (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Brake imbalance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.062% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.062% fail on Pedal
        • 0.062% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.026% fail on ABS (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic systems (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Components (96% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Hoses (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0051% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0051% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.015% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.0051% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0051% fail on Lever
      • 0.0051% fail on Cable
    • 0.010% fail on Electronic stability system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Suspension (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage condition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.031% fail on Suspension arms (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (98% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Wheel bearings (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Rear (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Front
    • 0.0051% fail on General condition
    • 0.0051% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0051% fail on Condition
    • 0.0051% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.0051% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.0051% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.0051% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.0051% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 0.24% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0051% fail on Attachment
    • 0.098% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.16% fail on Registration plates and VIN (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plate (63% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Fuel system (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Cap (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Emissions (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Exhaust system (98% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Doors (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.0051% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.021% fail on Seats (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Drivers
    • 0.015% fail on Body condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Load security
      • 0.010% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.0051% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0051% fail on Chassis
  • 0.098% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Steering system (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0051% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0051% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.087% fail on Road Wheels (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda Jazz (2008 - 2015)
    Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.

    Search Good Garages