Honda Jazz MOT Results
Registered in 201083.1% pass rate
from 19,485 tests in 2017
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.
-
5.7% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Position lamps
(41% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Front lamps (30% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Rear lamps (95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on All position lamps
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Side repeaters (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Individual lamps (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on All direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Headlamps
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0051% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.0051% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Fog lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Tell tale
- 0.010% fail on Switch
- 0.13% fail on Battery
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Horn (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Rear reflectors (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Electrical wiring
-
5.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.1% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen (44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Mirrors
- 0.015% fail on Bonnet (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Size/type (70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
3.1% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
(15% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Brake linings
- 0.0051% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.74% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Rear wheels (63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Front wheels (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Brake imbalance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.021% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Brake operation
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.062% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.062% fail on
Pedal
- 0.062% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.062% fail on
Pedal
- 0.026% fail on ABS (87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Components
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Hoses (90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0051% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.015% fail on
Components
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.0051% fail on Linkage
- 0.0051% fail on Lever
- 0.0051% fail on Cable
- 0.010% fail on Electronic stability system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
(15% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.021% fail on Linkage condition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Shock absorbers
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.031% fail on
Suspension arms
(98% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (98% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Wheel bearings
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Rear (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Front
- 0.0051% fail on General condition
-
0.0051% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0051% fail on Condition
- 0.0051% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
- 0.0051% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.0051% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.0051% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.0051% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.0051% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.24% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Requirements
- 0.0051% fail on Attachment
-
0.098% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.087% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Registration plate (63% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Fuel system
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Cap (53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Emissions (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Exhaust system (98% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Fuel system
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Doors
(52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Passengers other
- 0.0051% fail on Passengers front
-
0.021% fail on
Seats
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Drivers
- 0.015% fail on Body condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Load security
- 0.010% fail on Bootlid
-
0.0051% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.0051% fail on Chassis
-
0.062% fail on
Doors
(52% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Steering
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
Steering system
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Drag link end
- 0.0051% fail on Steering arm
- 0.015% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0051% fail on Steering operation
-
0.077% fail on
Steering system
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Road Wheels
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Honda Jazz (2008 - 2015)
Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.