Honda Jazz MOT Results

Registered in 2009
81.6% pass rate
from 21,886 tests in 2017
(44% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Rear lamps (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.037% fail on Individual lamps (96% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0046% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.50% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0091% fail on Horn (96% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0046% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0046% fail on Lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (8.2% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.014% fail on Bonnet (86% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.046% fail on Size/type (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0046% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components (13% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Rear wheels (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Front wheels (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.0091% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.0046% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Hoses (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0091% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Leaks
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.037% fail on ABS (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.0091% fail on Cable
      • 0.0046% fail on Lever
      • 0.0046% fail on Pivot
    • 0.0091% fail on Electronic stability system (88% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Suspension (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0091% fail on Location
    • 0.055% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.055% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.055% fail on Wheel bearings (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Rear (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Front
    • 0.055% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Front drive shafts (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0046% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0046% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.018% fail on Macpherson strut (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Front suspension joints (97% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0091% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.0046% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.0091% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.0046% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.0046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0046% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.0046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0046% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 0.27% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Requirements (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0091% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0046% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate (50% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Body condition
    • 0.059% fail on Doors (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.0046% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0046% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.055% fail on Seats
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0091% fail on Passengers
    • 0.014% fail on Load security
      • 0.0091% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.0046% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.0091% fail on Body security
    • 0.0046% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.0046% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0046% fail on Chassis
  • 0.21% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering system (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0046% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.032% fail on Power steering (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Operation
      • 0.0046% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.0046% fail on Drive system
      • 0.0046% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.027% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Emissions (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Fuel system (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Cap
      • 0.0046% fail on System
    • 0.0091% fail on Emissions not tested (94% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0046% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda Jazz (2008 - 2015)
    Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.

    Search Good Garages